Helena Mihaljević and Lucía Santamaría have published the article “Mathematics publications and authors’ gender: Learning from the Gender Gap in Science project” in Eur. Math. Soc. Mag. 123 (2022), pp. 34–38.

Eugénie Hunsicker has published the “Report: EWM panel discussion on gender balance in mathematics at the European Congress of Mathematics” Eur. Math. Soc. Mag. 123 (2022), pp. 28–33.

facesofwomeninmathematics.com is the project website of the film project Words of Women in Mathematics in the Time of Corona, follow-up project of the 2018 film Faces of Women in Mathematics.

‘A Global Approach to the Gender Gap in Mathematical, Computing, and Natural Sciences: How to Measure It, How to Reduce It?’ The final report of the project ‘Gender Gap in Science Book’ is available online here.

The term “gendered innovations” was coined by Londa Schiebinger. Here you can find interesting case studies and analyses in the field of innovation in science, health & medicine, engineering and environment.

Through the Global Gender Index, the World Economic Forum quantifies the magnitude of gender-based disparities and tracks their progress over time.

Chad M. Topaz and Shilad Sen provide the first measure of gender distribution on editorial boards in the mathematical sciences, and offer insights and methods that suggest future studies.

Umida Baltaeva, Helena Mihaljevic-Brandt, Lucia Santamaria, Marco Tullney provide a basis for discussions on how to address the problem of closing the gender gap in mathematics publication.

Greg Martin describes the biases against women in mathematics and makes explicit suggestions for organizing conferences in ways that are equitable for female mathematicians.

Benjamin M. Schmidt provides an interactive exploration of the different language used to describe male and female teachers.

In 2012, PISA asked students about their intentions to use mathematics in their future studies and careers. The results are presented in this report.

The first half analyses how small (statistically insignificant) biases at each stage lead to a huge underrepresentation of women in top science positions.

Nature has assessed the percentage of women among their referees, profiled researchers, and externally written Comment and World View articles.

This is a report from 2006, giving statistics on the proportion of women in mathematics in many European countries.

A new study shows that identical applications are judged differently if a male name is assigned to it than if the name is female.

A collection of studies on gender bias in peer-review, and a discussion of the pros and cons of the `double-blind’ review process proposed by some to amend the problem.

The genSET Consensus Seminars brought together 14 European science leaders to share knowledge and experience and arrive at a consensus view on the gender dimension in science.

She Figures 2006 – Women and Science Statistics and Indicators is the second publication of selected EU employment statistics, which provide illuminating perspectives on the current employment situation.

The UNESCO Courier takes an in-depth look at the issues facing female scientists today.